Biology 480, Case Studies in Biology, Fall 2007

 

Dr. Kari Benson

Office: 218 Hobbs Hall, Phone: (434)544-8364

Office Hours: TR 2-3:30 p.m. or by appointment

Email: benson@lynchburg.edu

 

Scheduled Class Time: The class meets Tuesdays and Thursdays from 4:00 to 5:15 a.m. in Hobbs 221.

 

Required materials: Most materials will be provided by the instructor or obtained by the student via literary research.  Students should all have a copy of Victoria McMillan’s Writing Papers in the Biological Sciences from earlier classes in the major.  We will continue to use this text.

 

Course Description:  This course is intended as a capstone course and is designed to allow students to study specific topics in biology in depth. It utilizes case studies in biology and draws upon previous coursework in the biology major. Emphasis is placed on critical thinking and problem solving skills.

 

Course Objectives:

When you have completed this course, you should be able to:

·         Explain the process of scientific inquiry and how it is used in testing general biological principles. 

Activity: Analyze excerpts from studies; derive hypotheses, experimental procedures, and design; data representation and the relationship between data and conclusions.

·         Describe components of the process of scientific reasoning and use scientific reasoning in the analysis of scientific reports in the popular media. 

Activity: Learn and use the “If-And-Then-Therefore” and Giere’s 6-step models of scientific reasoning.

·         Recognize when information is needed and locate, evaluate, and effectively use the needed information (i.e. exhibit competency in information literacy).

Activity: Learn the ACRL’s standards of information literacy and use these skills in researching biological topics.

·         Identify the major discoveries/achievements in Biology from the Rennaissance to the present.  Additionally, explain how advances in science were shaped by advances in technology.

Activity: Research and “prioritize” discoveries/achievements in biology by century.  Make a “web” (identify connections) of related (dependent) events.  Evaluate the role of emerging technologies relative to the events.

·         Apply information pertaining to major biological concepts in solving “real-world” problems in biology.

Activity: Case Studies.

·         Recognize major recent works/discoveries in biology.

Activity: Present a summary of research on a “hot topic” over the last decade.  Present and write a summary of science news articles collected through the semester.

·         Analyze the components and correctly interpret conclusions of science reported in peer-reviewed, scientific journals (i.e. primary literature). 

Activity: Analyze scientific journal articles.

 

These course objectives meet objectives 1.1b, 3.1a, 3.1b, half of 3.1d, 3.1g, and 4.1a of the Biology Major (see www.lynchburg.edu/irad/biology.htm).

 

Class Policies:

Attendance: This is a small class, each one of you must be here for all of your success.  Please come prepared and on time to class.   The instructor reserves the right to reduce the course grade if a student is lacking in attendance or participation (the student will be informed if this option is exercised).  Three unexplained absences will result in a 5% reduction in your final grade, and five or more absences will result in failure for the course. 

 

Teamwork:  Part of your grade will be assessed through peer evaluation of your contribution to group work.  In that the group is small, everyone will rely on one another a great deal.  Please be mindful of this component of your grade as you work throughout the semester.  The instructor reserves the right to modify the group-given score if it seems inappropriate.

Working in Groups

                A portion of the work in this course will involve collaboration with a partner, working as part of a group, and the peer review process.  You are expected to take advantage of peer review – both in accepting feedback from others, and in providing a sufficient critique to assist others in improving their work.  These interactions are both formal, and informal.  These interactions are not always easy, but they are necessary to good science.  As you work through these collaborations, I hope you learn to communicate better, and discover what your own strengths and weaknesses are in relation to group activities.  Here are some basic ground rules to help as you go along.

 

 

                                                       in giving feedback to others

·         be honest – but be aware that your feedback is subjective.

·         describe rather than evaluate – remember you are criticizing a sentence, not a person.

·         be aware of whether your partners are ready for feedback. Do not be critical when others are not prepared to hear or understand that criticism.

·         do not evade the issues – go for what you feel is important, don’t dwell on minor nitpicky issues.

 

 

in receiving feedback

·         listen carefully

·         ask if something is unclear

·         take the time to think about what is said.  Consider feedback you receive as a valuable commodity.  Make note of what you hear, think on it more later, and then decide how that can help you change and grow as a person, writer or scientist.  Feedback is not something against which you must defend yourself.

·         do not necessarily expect solutions.  Identifying a problem, and solving that problem are two separate issues and may not happen at the same time.

 

 

Honor Code: I encourage a free exchange of ideas both in and out of the classroom. Science is a collaborative endeavor. However, when a scientist gets help from another scientist, they are expected to acknowledge or reference them fully. A description of what constitutes an honor code violation is available in the catalogue and in the student handbook. If you are unsure about how to attribute another individual for intellectual contribution to your work, please see an instructor prior to the deadline of the assignment. Failure to adhere to these rules can result in failure in the course.

 

 

Major Assignments:

 

Ongoing:

 

Weekly: Collect one biology news (popular media) articles weekly.  You will need to read the articles to complete the assignment.  The articles must be kept in a binder.  Attach a short (paragraph) critique of the article appending the article.  I will conduct periodic spot checks, to ensure that all students are current on this assignment.  Points will be given based on thoroughness and timeliness of articles.  Each student will give a presentation on several of the critiques, and will summarize “What I learned from reading the articles I saved” report (orally and written).

 

Monthly (four articles total): Using appropriate search engines (Pub/Med or something similar) locate and acquire a piece of scientific primary literature relating to one of the news articles you have collected during your weekly assignment.  As a writing assignment, prepare a type written analysis (compare and contrast) of the news article and the primary literature.  This should be brief and to the point, no more than 1-2 pages double spaced.  This should also be included in your binder.

 

History of Biology: The team of students will generate a “top-ten” list of biology achievements from the Rennaissance to current, including a justification for the achievements that they have included.  This will be extended to address how advances in technology have impacted biological achievements.  This presentation will be graded on both the aesthetics of the presentation and on the justification of the chosen achievements. The team will be asked to submit both a copy of the presentation (powerpoint format is acceptable) and a document summarizing the justification for their entries.

 

Technology:  As a portion of the history of biology top-ten, you must incorporate (as a section or throughout the presentation) a narrative describing how changes in available technology (and which changes in particular) enabled scientists to make advancements when they have.

 

Hot Topics in Biology: Students will focus on the previous decade and enumerate the greatest achievements during this time period.  Then, the students will focus on one area of inquiry and summarize how this area has grown and changed during the previous decade.  This area of inquiry must be one that it important and influential (as justified by the students). This presentation will be graded on both the aesthetics of the presentation and on the justification of the chosen achievements. The team will be asked to submit both a copy of the presentation (powerpoint format is acceptable) and a document summarizing the justification for their entries.

 

Future:  For this portion of the hot topics presentation, each team is asked to wrap up their presentation with a list of the most important areas for improvement in the next five to ten years.  Which questions or avenues will provide the most meaningful improvements in our understanding of biology in the coming years?

 

Case Studies:  We will gain experience with case studies throughout the semester.  After the last “formal” case study, students will be given a novel case study to solve.  The resolution of this case study will occur in mid-November.

 

Information Validity: Students will select a current area of dispute in biology.  The student will research different viewpoints on this topic in the current media (news), primary literature, and on three different types of websites: authoritative (such as a governmental site), informative (such as a non-proprietary information site), and an opinion based site (such as a personal website).  The student must then discuss the validity of the information, particularly with respect to the biases inherent in each type of information.  Then, the student must generate a reasoned opinion on the matter from all of the information.

 

Capstone Biology Learning Assessment:  Where the final exam will be a take-home exam, you will meet for a final exam.  Participation in a final biology assessment is required during that course period.  Performance on this tool will not be a portion of your course grade.


Grading:

 

The following assignments will be weighted as follows (percent final course grade).

The instructor reserves the right to adjust weighting of grades (with prior notification).

 

Exam I                                     10

Exam II                                    10

Final                                         10

Case Studies/Participation          10

History of Biology                     10

Technology and Advancement      3

Hot Topics                                10

Future                                          3

Information Validity                   10

Article Collection                         4

Article Paragraphs                      5

Article Critiques                        10

Article Presentations                   5

Total                                         100

 

 

Tentative Course Schedule:

 

Week:                                       Topic:                                                              

1                                  Introduction, Scientific Inquiry, Start Collecting Articles

2                                 Inquiry/ Graphing

3                                  Inquiry, Information Literacy (Self-directed case)

4                                  Start History of Biology Research

5                                  Scientific Reasoning

6                                  Six-step Program

7                                  Exam I, History Presentations, Discussion

8                                  Holiday, Case Studies

9                                  Case Studies, Information Literacy

10                                 Case Studies

11                                 Hot Topics, Journal Articles

12                                 Exam II,  Journal Articles

13                                 Articles, Holiday

14                                 Presentations/Review                                                   

December 14, 7:00 p.m.             Comprehensive Exam                                         

 


 

Grading Structure:

 

Number Grade

Letter Grade

 

Number Grade

Letter Grade

97-100

A+

 

77-79

C+

93-96

A

 

73-76

C

90-92

A-

 

70-72

C-

87-89

B+

 

67-69

D+

83-86

B

 

63-66

D

80-82

B-

 

60-62

D-

 

 

 

<60

F

 

 

Writing Grade Criteria

A written submission in the A range is based upon original (or exceptional) logical, and coherently organized set of ideas; it makes a clear and persuasive argument; it brings in specific, relevant examples to back up its assertions; its points at each turn, are clearly articulated: the words carry precise meaning, they don’t obscure it; its sentences use only the words their ideas require, not any more; its paragraphs have distinct, though related roles in the documents cohesion as a whole, each holding one thoroughly asserted idea (not two competing ideas, nor one idea half-asserted); it appropriately and accurately uses other sources, and its sentences are without grammatical, spelling, or typographical mistakes that exacting proof-reading would catch.  (All of this takes a lot of work and time.  If it is all very nearly accomplished, the document usually earns an A-).

 

A written submission in the B range: A very good paper, the writing of which is clearly, thoughtfully, and effectively executed.  What sometimes prevents an “A” is a lack of clear, logical explanation, thorough thinking or careful proofreading.  If two of these virtues are absent and the other areas of the paper are strong, the paper will usually earn a B-.

 

A written submission in the C range: some conspicuous flaw usually earns a paper a C; its argument is underdeveloped, it contains only minimal textual support, or lacks proper documentation from the literature, it has problems with organization and/or sentence clarity, it is typically in need of proofreading.

 

A written submission in the D range contains more than one of problems described for a “C” paper or finds another way to convince its reader the author has not spent nearly enough time on the thinking and writing of the work.  In addition it is clear that no proofreading has been done. 

 

A written submission receiving and F misses on all criteria (originality, articulateness, persuasiveness, organization, the absence of mechanical mistakes, proper use of the [scientific] literature).